Disclosure log

‘Any documents, emails, correspondence or information regarding building mould at the following ANU student residences from January 1, 2022 to September 30, 2024.

· Lena Karmel Lodge

Fenner Hall

This request includes but is not limited to:

· Any reports, email correspondence or orders for work to address dampness or building mould

· Complaints made about building mould

· Correspondence to residents or staff members about building mould 

· Any complaints, emails or documents regarding sickness among residents or students which is associated with building mould

Any documents, emails, correspondence or information regarding a media request made by Lanie Tindale at The Canberra Times on May 27, from May 27 to May 28. The media request is about mould at ANU student residences.

Under the Freedom of Information Act 1982, I request access to copies of the following documents: 
All reports pretaining to the 'benchmarking exercise' referred to in the Australian National University's public communication relating to 2025 parking fee increases, in addition to any key reports/documents containing recommendations for setting/determining the proposed 2025 91ÊÓƵparking rates. 

Date range for the documents being requested
1st July 2023 to 2nd October 2024

The minutes from any 91ÊÓƵCouncil meeting held between August 8 and August 29

Under the Freedom of Information Act 1982, I request access to copies of the following documents: 
Any documents, agreements, records of conversations or correspondence relating to funding of the Australian National University either directly by any foreign government, through offices of foreign governments or by representatives of foreign governments.

Date range for the documents being requested
1 January 1993 to the Present day being 26 June 2024

This email is to request all information available to me, for the purpose of the FOI Act, concerning the nomination and subsequent implementation of the nomination of Professor Saikal to this status.

I would like to know specifically:

- What 91ÊÓƵstaff members, college executives, and/or College Deans nominated Professor Saikal to the Vice-Chancellor for consideration of conferral of the title of Emeritus Professor;

- Who were his two referees;

- When did the Vice-Chancellor approve and award the Emeritus title;

- What is the nature and length of the conferred association.

To that aim, could you please provide me with: 

• all 2023 and 2024 documents and correspondence between the Vice-Chancellor and 91ÊÓƵexecutives (school reviews, internal memos, reports, emails etc.) related to Professor Saikal's nomination and among them: 
• all correspondence between the Chancellery, CAIS, RSSS and CASS members of staff, academic and professional, concerning the above mentioned nomination and its implementation(i.e. conferral of title).